search this blog

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Near Eastern origin of Ashkenazi Levite R1a

Over at Nature Communications, Rootsi et al. report on a newly discovered Ashkenazi-specific subclade of R1a, defined by the M582 mutation. They argue that it's a marker of Near Eastern origin, and based on the comprehensive data in their paper, I'd say they're correct. However, it's important to note that this doesn't preclude an ultimate Eastern European or Central Asian source of M582 in the Near East. For instance, an R1a mutation ancestral to M582 might have been introduced by the proto-Iranians from the steppe into what is now Iran during the early Indo-European dispersals. Indeed, that's actually what Figure 1a from the study suggests (phylogenetic tree of R1a below). The paper is open access, but here are a few quotes anyway:

Haplogroup R1a-M582 was only sporadically observed in Europe, the Diaspora residence of Ashkenazi Jews. Notably, it was not identified among 2,149 samples (including 922 R1a-M198) of non-Jews from East Europe, where the Ashkenazi Jewish community flourished in recent centuries (Table 1).


Within 1,068 West/North European samples (106 R1a-M198), M582 was observed in just one German sample, and among 3,756 Central/South European samples (710 R1a-M198), it was found only in one Hungarian and one Slovakian sample (Table 1).


Among 3,739 Near Eastern samples (303 R1a-M198), R1a-M582 was identified in various populations, with the highest frequency occurring within Iranians collected from the southeastern Kerman population who self-identified as Persians, northwestern Iranian Azeri and in Cilician Anatolian Kurds, at 2.86%, 2.50% and 2.83%, respectively (Table 1). In contrast, among 2,164 samples from the Caucasus (211 R1a-M198), R1a-M582 was found in just one Nogay sample (Table 1).


Considering the historical records of Ashkenazi Jews, three potential geographic sources should be considered: the Near East, which was the geographic location for the ancient Hebrews; Europe, which was the residence of the Ashkenazi Jewish Diaspora and the region in which they evolved for nearly two millennia; and the region overlapping with the no longer extant mid-11th Century Khazarian Khaganate, whose ruling class has been suggested to have converted to Judaism [18]. Our data render the latter source highly unlikely since the Khazarian Khaganate overlapped with the Northern Pontic-Caspian steppe and the North Caucasus region, in which just one Nogay sample carried the R1a-M582 haplogroup (Table 1). Furthermore, the Nogays, formerly a powerful Kipchak Turkic-speaking nomadic confederation, are relatively recent inhabitants of the Caucasus, and the STR haplotype of the sole R1a-M582 Nogay sample lies outside of the Levite cluster. Had the Caucasus region been the source for the Ashkenazi modal lineage, we likely would have found R1a-M582 Y-chromosomes in some of its 20 local populations examined in our sample of more than 2,000 Y-chromosomes (Table 1).


Near Eastern populations are the only populations in which haplogroup R1a-M582 was found at significant frequencies (Table 1). Moreover, the representative samples displayed substantial diversity even within this geographic region (Fig. 1b). Higher frequencies and diversities often suggest lineage autochthony.


Rootsi, S. et al. Phylogenetic applications of whole Y-chromosome sequences and the Near Eastern origin of Ashkenazi Levites. Nat. Commun. 4:2928 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3928 (2013).

See also...

The Poltavka outlier

Saturday, December 7, 2013

The Slavic-like diet of a Wielbark population from Iron Age Poland

The results from the first study on the eating habits of the people of the Wielbark Culture are now out in a peer-reviewed article: Diet and society in Poland before the state: stable isotope evidence from a Wielbark population (2nd c. AD). They were originally published back in 2012 as part of a thesis, which also included data on the diet of suspected Viking settlers in Medieval Poland (see here).

The δ13Cca values from Rogowo [the Wielbark site in question] suggest millet contributed between 0% and 35% to overall diet, depending on the individual. This corroborates archaeobotanical evidence for a broad-spectrum agricultural strategy including millet, barley, rye, oats and wheat (Wasylikowa et al. 1991).


Unlike in Eastern and Southern Europe, millet is not widespread in Western Europe. With its occurrence following cultural distribution patterns rather than geography or climate, millet appears to characterize diets of Slavic populations. In her book documenting the history of Polish cuisine, Maria Dembińska posits that “… the Polish preference for millet was cultural and that millet must have arrived with the earliest Slavic migrants” (104). That millet might be used as a proxy for Slavic migrations is an interesting possibility, given the controversy surrounding the relationship between the Wielbark culture and the issue of Slavic ethnogenesis (c.f., Dąbrowski 2006). Millet consumption among Wielbark and early medieval Polish populations represents a potentially significant continuity between the Roman era and the medieval period in Poland.


Diet at Rogowo was based on terrestrial foods (meat, milk, and plants), but with supplemental input from fish (likely low- δ15N anadromous or littoral fish), indicating an overall broad-spectrum subsistence economy. Millet was consumed at Rogowo, and in greater amounts than during the medieval period to follow (c.f., Fig. 6; Reitsema et al. 2010; Reitsema 2012). Stable isotope differences between the sexes indicate that men and women may have consumed different foods, although there is a possibility that women migrated to Rogowo from an isotopically different region of Europe.

Ancient DNA has already been extracted from some of the Rogowo samples, and the results presented in a thesis focusing on the ethnogenesis of Slavs, and in particular the question of genetic continuity in present-day Poland from the Iron Ago to the early Medieval period (see here). The outcome was somewhat inconclusive, because the study was based on low resolution mtDNA haplotypes. However, the most informative haplotypes showed greatest affinity to those of the present-day Polish population. A more detailed genetic analysis of Wielbark and many other ancient Polish samples, using next-generation sequencing, is on the way (see here).


Laurie J. Reitsema, Tomasz Kozłowski, Diet and society in Poland before the state: stable isotope evidence from a Wielbark population (2nd c. AD), Anthropological Review. Volume 0, Issue 0, Pages 1–22, ISSN (Online) 2083-4594, ISSN (Print) 1898-6773, DOI: 10.2478/anre-2013-0010, November 2013

Friday, December 6, 2013

The Globular Amphora man from Late Neolithic Poland

He was short (<160 cm), probably lactose intolerant, had an exceedingly long melon (cranial index = 72.6), and belonged to mtDNA haplogroup K2a. In other words, he was a typical Neolithic farmer, and clearly different from the average modern-day inhabitant of the North European Plain.

No doubt, his people were largely replaced by newcomers from the east and also west during the frequent population shifts in the region after the Neolithic (see here). However, the stable isotope analysis suggests that he ate a lot of millet, which is known as a typically Slavic cultigen in Europe.

ABSTRACT: In 2007 a ceremonial complex representing the Globular Amphora Culture was discovered in Kowal (the Kuyavia region, Poland). Radiocarbon dating demonstrated that the human remains associated with the complex are of similar antiquity, i.e. 4.105 ± 0.035 conv. and 3.990 ± 0.050 conv. Kyrs. After calibration, this suggests a period between 2850 and 2570 BC (68.2% likelihood), or more specifically, 2870 to 2500 BC (95.4% likelihood). Morphological data indicate that the skeleton belonged to a male who died at 27–35 years of age. The unusual morphology of his hard palate suggests this individual may have had a speech disorder. Stable oxygen isotope values of the individual's teeth are above the locally established oxygen isotope range of precipitation, but due to sample limitations we cannot conclusively say whether the individual is of non-local origin. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios were analyzed to reconstruct the diet of the studied individual, and show a terrestrial-based diet. Through ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis, the mtDNA haplogroup K2a* and lactose intolerance as evidenced by homozygous C-13910 allele were identified. These aDNA results are the first sequences reported for an individual representing the Globular Amphora Culture, enriching the still modest pool of human genetic data from the Neolithic.

Kozłowski T., Stepańczak B., Laurie J. Reitsama, Osipowicz G., Szostek K., Płoszaj T., Jędryhowska-Dańska K., Pawlyta J., Paluszkiewicz C., Witas H.W. Osteological, chemical and genetic analyses of the human skeleton from a Neolithic site representing the Globular Amphora Culture (Kowal, Kuyavia region, Poland), Anthropologie [In Press]

See also...

Polish "Goths" enjoyed their millet, while Polish "Vikings" did not

Monday, October 28, 2013

Ancient DNA from prehistoric Bulgaria and Denmark

A paper at the AJHG describes a new cost effective method of significantly increasing the amount of authentic DNA output from ancient samples:

By using biotinylated RNA baits transcribed from genomic DNA libraries, we are able to capture DNA fragments from across the human genome. We demonstrate this method on libraries created from four Iron Age and Bronze Age human teeth from Bulgaria, as well as bone samples from seven Peruvian mummies and a Bronze Age hair sample from Denmark. Prior to capture, shotgun sequencing of these libraries yielded an average of 1.2% of reads mapping to the human genome (including duplicates). After capture, this fraction increased substantially, with up to 59% of reads mapped to human and enrichment ranging from 6- to 159-fold.

This is particularly good news for studies which aim to extract autosomal DNA from hundreds of ancient remains, like Gothenburg University's The Rise project, which I excitedly blogged about earlier this year (see here). In fact, I suspect the aforementioned Danish hair sample is one of the samples from The Rise dataset. The reason I say that is because Morten Allentoft is a co-author on this paper, and he's also doing the DNA analysis for The Rise (see here).

In any case, below are two global Principal Component Analyses (PCA) featuring one of the ancient Bulgarians (V2) and the ancient Dane (M4). The principal components (PC1 & 2) were computed using only modern samples, and then the ancient samples projected onto the PCA space.

The ancient Bulgarian is sitting more or less where modern Bulgarians are usually found on such global plots. On the other hand, the ancient Dane is clearly shifted towards East Asia and the Americas, and as a result clusters with Finns, which I suppose is somewhat unexpected because that never happens with modern Danes. So either there's a problem with the analysis, like, say, projection bias (see below for more details), or this Bronze Age Dane was in fact more eastern in terms of global genetic affinities than modern Danes. The latter might well be true if, for instance, he was a recent descendant of migrants from the east (like present-day Russia), and/or he harbored more Mesolithic hunter-gatherer ancestry than Danes do today.

Now, here are a couple of PCA limited to European samples from the supplemental data PDF, including another ancient Bulgarian (K8) and the same ancient Dane (M4). Unfortunately, PC1 appears to be mostly a reflection of the well documented and very recent founder effect and strong genetic drift experienced by the Finnish population. In other words, it's not saying much more than the fact that the ancient samples weren't affected by the same demographic events and genetic drift as Finns during the past few hundred years. It might have been possible to get more informative results by reducing the Finnish sample to only a handful of the least drifted (ie. least Finnish-like) individuals.

Moreover, it's curious that both ancient samples land in more or less the middle of their respective plots in PC2, despite the fact that they come from very different parts of Europe. I suspect that in these instances projection bias is indeed the problem.

Projection bias is similar to the "calculator effect" (see here), but it affects PCA, especially PCA that include only closely related populations, like from Europe. For more background see Haasl et al. 2012 and Lee et al. 2012.

It's also interesting to note that two of the Iron Age Bulgarians are reported as belonging to mtDNA haplogroups U3b and HV, respectively. Both of these haplogroups are generally accepted to be of Near Eastern origin. They're rare in Europe today (usually <2%), but relatively more common in Bulgaria than most other European countries. This suggests some genetic continuity in Bulgaria from at least the Iron Age to the present. Indeed, U3 has been reported from early Neolithic samples from Germany and Ukraine, which means that the ancient Bulgarian U3 lineage need not have arrived in Europe from the Near East during the metal ages.


Carpenter et al., Pulling out the 1%: Whole-Genome Capture for the Targeted Enrichment of Ancient DNA Sequencing Libraries, The American Journal of Human Genetics (2013),

See also...

More info on two Thracian genomes from Iron Age Bulgaria + a complaint

PCA projection bias in ancient DNA studies

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Polish "Goths" enjoyed their millet, while Polish "Vikings" did not

As far as I know, this thesis from the Ohio State University is the first study on dietary changes in what is now Poland from the Neolithic to the Medieval period.

Interestingly, Wielbark culture "Goths" really enjoyed their millet. On the other hand, purported Viking settlers along the Vistula seemed to have largely stuck to their Scandinavian eating habits, almost snubbing millet outright in the process. Why is this important, you might ask? Well...

The human samples studied here show evidence for consumption of millet, a uniquely Slavic cultigen in Europe that may be useful in studying Slavic migrations. My stable isotope data track millet consumption in Poland back to the Neolithic period (approximately 2,000 BC).


Millet was cultivated in Poland since the Neolithic, but increased significantly in the Roman Era (Wasylikowka et al. 1991: 227). Millet is common among Slavic populations and has been documented in Southern and Eastern Europe by numerous paleobotanical (Polcyn 2002; Pyrgała 1970; Rösch et al. 1992; Wasylikowa et al. 1991; Zohary and Hopf 1988) and stable isotope investigations (Le Huray and Schutkowski 2005; Murray and Schoeninger 1988; Reitsema et al. 2010). Stable isotope studies in Western Europe (e.g.: Netherlands and Britain) indicate an absence of millet in human diet during and preceding the medieval period (Randsborg 1985; Richards et al. 2006; Schutkowski et al. 1999). This East-West dichotomy suggests Slavs had a cultural preference for millet (Dembińska 1999).

The Roman-era cemetery at Rogowo was excavated in 1999 and 2000. The cemetery includes 137 inhumation and 151 cremation burials (Fig. 4.2). Biritual cemeteries such as this are characteristic of the Wielbark culture, which occupied Poland during the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD. It is possible that Wielbark populations were one of several referred to by the Romans as “Goths” (Heather 1996). It is also possible that the Wielbark are early Slavs from which modern Slavs are descended (for discussion, see Piontek 2006).


The δ13C values from Rogowo indicate millet contributed between 0% and 35% to overall diet, depending on the individual. The fact that δ13C and δ15N values are not positively correlated also supports an interpretation of direct millet consumption, rather than marine fish, anadromous fish or C4-foddered animal consumption.


Data from Murray and Schoeninger (1988) represent an Iron Age population from Slovenia that consumed terrestrial plant and animal resources with a C4 signal. This C4 signal is either via direct consumption of millet, or via consumption of animals foddered on millet. Data from LeHuray and Schutkowski (2005) represent two La Tène populations from the modern day Czech Republic, and individuals from Hallstatt sites in Austria. Data from Tafuri et al. (2009) represent another diet with a C4 signal from Bronze Age Italy.

Comparing European samples, δ15N values among the Slovenian, Czech and Polish samples are very similar, ranging from approximately 8.5‰ to 11.0‰. The δ13Ccoll values at Rogowo are intermediate, but more closely resemble values from La Tene Czech individuals with low millet consumption than values from Iron Age Slovenia with high millet consumption. This suggests a terrestrial-based diet including millet at Rogowo.


On closer examination of the collagen data from Kałdus site 4, there seem to be two groups of data points that I emphasize by separating them with an otherwise arbitrary line in Figure 7.9. One of these arbitrary clusters plots near data from Viking and medieval Sweden representing populations that reportedly consumed C3 and marine foods, but no millet (Kosiba et al. 2007). The Swedish population is also pictured in Figure 7.9 where it is clearly distinct from the millet-consuming Kałdus population.

Like individual K4-13A-M, individual K4-60-M was buried with a bronze bowl at his feet, an element of Scandinavian style burials (Biermann 2008; Chudziak 2003). Interestingly, his δ13Cap signature was next to the lowest at Kałdus site 4 (-14.05‰) and one of only two to indicate a diet devoid of millet. This suggests he had migrated from Scandinavia, where millet is not documented in diet during the medieval period (Eriksson et al. 2008; Kjellström et al. 2009; Kosiba et al. 2007; Liden and Nelson 1994; Linderholm et al. 2008; Wasylikowa et al. 1991). The other individual with very low δ13C isotope signatures at Kałdus site 4 is K4-192-F. This female may also have migrated from a region where millet was not consumed. Another single burial exhibiting Scandinavian elements is individual K4-101-F, who was interred in a wooden chamber. Like K4-60-M, her isotope values also suggest no or very little millet.

Of course, only high-resolution ancient DNA from these remains will be able to confirm whether they belonged to settlers of Scandinavian origin. However, based on the stable isotope results I don't hold out much hope for the Wielbark Culture skeletons from Rogowo showing any explicit genetic links to Scandinavia. On the other hand, it seems as if those Viking-like burials from Kaldus really did belong to Vikings.


Laurie Jean Reitsema, Stable Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Analysis of Human Diet Change in Prehistoric and Historic Poland, Dissertation, The Ohio State University, 2012.

See also...

First direct evidence of genetic continuity in West and Central Poland from the Iron Age to the present

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Hundreds of prehistoric North European genomes coming soon

Update 10/08/2015: 101 ancient Eurasian genomes (Allentoft et al. 2015)


It looks like we'll soon be inundated with ancient DNA from across Northern Europe thanks to a project called The Rise, focusing on the formation of Bronze Age societies in Southern Scandinavia. The exciting news for me is that prehistoric skeletons from Poland are also being studied as part of the effort. Below are a few quotes about the part of the project dealing with ancient DNA, called "Human Mobility".

The study will be based on burials with preserved skeletal material from southern Scandinavia, from the late middle Neolithic, late Neolithic and early Bronze Age periods. This is a material which is essential for many of the questions discussed, but that so far has received little systematic treatment. Comparisons will also be made with reference material from earlier periods and other regions, such as Germany and Poland. A systematic comparison of bio-archaeological data with variations in burial practices and artifact compositions will provide us with new insights on socially effective ways of classifying people during these periods, and contribute to our understanding of how gender, ethnicities and elites were constructed.


The key focus of the ancient DNA study will be to exploit recent technological and computational developments, in order to reconstruct the genetic history, and origins, of the Nordic and north European populations of the 3rd and 2nd millennium BC. When compared with pre-existing European Neolithic ancient DNA datasets, and modern DNA datasets, the new data will supplement and add historical depth to the strontium isotope analyses, as well as resolve kinship between the ancient samples. Three strategies will be employed:

1. Several hundred south Scandinavian and central European (German and Polish) skeletons from the 3rd and 2nd millennium BC will be pre-screened for appropriate DNA survival and quality, in order to generate a test dataset. Based on previous result, combined with new techniques that significantly enhance success rates, we anticipate subsequently genotyping between 100 and 150 samples for both mitochondrial (complete mtDNA genomes), Y chromosome and autosomal DNA (15,000 informative SNPs). This data will be compared against both published and unpublished ancient datasets and with modern datasets, in order to establish the geographical location and possible origin of primarily the new Corded Ware (CW), Single Grave (SG) and Battle Axe (BA) culture groups of the early 3rd millennium BC, but also of later Bronze Age groups of the same regions. The CW, SG and BA cultures are candidates for some major migrations that introduced a completely new social organization, and possibly Indo-European languages, that persisted into the Bronze Age. Did they have a steppe origin, a Nordic origin, a Polish/central European or a mixed origin? Did the later Bronze Age people of Scandinavia share genetic relations with these groups? The ancient DNA data will contribute to resolving this.

2. Using the data generated above, we will be able to investigate the kinship of skeletons within barrows and burials, in order to document whether they were family barrows, and whether some individuals were foreigners.

3. The complete nuclear genome sequence will be generated from hair sampled from one of the most well preserved skeletons – in particular that of an oak coffin burial of Jutland from 1400 BC. Recent technical developments published out of the Copenhagen group have demonstrated that not only is this feasible, but that such data can provide fine scale details about ancient humans – including resolving sample genetic origins to unprecedented detail, but also incidentally offer insights into functionally important genetic traits of the ancient people.

But that's not all. Recently we saw the announcement of a cutting-edge project called The Genomic History of Denmark. Its aim is to sequence 100 ancient Danish genomes from the Neolithic (including 7,000-year-old hunter-gatherers), metal ages, Viking Age, and the early Industrial Age. These samples will be compared to the genomes of 1000 modern Danes.

The project will likely add new views to Danish and European debates on heritage and national affiliations by re-addressing when and from where our ancestors came. At the same time results will allow Denmark as the first country to understand its genetic disease risk and drug suitability (personal genomics) from historical/evolutionary perspectives.

Thus, the data should allow us understanding when and possibly why current highly frequent genetic diseases, like haemochromatosis and cystic fibrosis, and increased HIV resistance became abundant in Denmark.

There are several other ancient DNA projects underway in Europe which I haven't got around to blogging about yet. I'll do that as soon as they produce some results. But I should probably mention that one of the most promising efforts, called BEAN (aka. Bridging the European and Anatolian Neolithic), recently launched a new website.

See also...

Coming soon: genome-wide data from more than forty 3-9K year-old humans from the ancient Russian steppe

Sunday, March 24, 2013

No Mongolian admixture in Poland

One of the most enduring myths or cliches concerning European genetic structure is that Poles carry Mongolian admixture. This claim has been repeated so often that it's now regarded by many as fact, including at academic level. Poles apparently acquired this admixture during Mongol and Turkic raids on Eastern Europe during the Middle Ages.

For a long time it was impossible to verify or debunk such claims due to a lack of genetic data from European and Asian populations at high enough resolution. However, that's no longer a problem. Indeed, I've run a wide range of detailed analyses as part of my Eurogenes Genetic Ancestry Project which have shown that my Polish sample does not carry inflated levels of Asian ancestry relative to other Northern and Central Europeans. But in this post it's probably more useful for me to focus on results from peer-reviewed studies to make my point.

I'll start with a look at genome-wide genetic data (aka. autosomal DNA). The bar plot below was featured in a recent study on genetic substructures in European Russia (1). It shows the results of an ADMIXTURE analysis at K=2 (two ancestral populations assumed) using 52,808 SNP markers, which splits the genomes of the samples into West and East Eurasian components. As you'd expect, these components are modal in Europeans and Han Chinese, respectively. This northern Han Chinese sample from Beijing is certainly a very useful proxy for Mongolians, because the East Eurasian component it creates is basically the same one that peaks in the least admixed Mongolian samples in other studies (for example, see 2).

The lowest levels of the East Eurasian component are carried by Latvians, Poles, Germans, Czechs and Italians. But this looks like noise anyway, because the Chinese carry a reciprocal amount of the West Eurasian component. In other words, it's most likely not a real signal of recent admixture from East Asia, but shared prehistoric Eurasian ancestry. If it's not noise, and actually represents admixture from an East Asian source like the Mongolians, then it's difficult to explain why it appears at a clearly higher level in Italians than Poles.

A couple of the Czechs do carry inflated amounts of the East Eurasian component, and I'd say they're Czech Roma with significant South Asian admixture who weren't removed as outliers from the dataset. It's also worth mentioning that the Komi, Finns and Russians (like the Rus_HGDP sample from Kargopol) show higher levels of this component than the Central Europeans. However, this doesn't necessarily mean they have Mongolian ancestry. Indeed, another study has shown that the Kargopol Russians carry various Siberian-specific components, rather than the type of East Asian influence which makes up the majority of Mongolian genome-wide genetic structure (2).

Moreover, the Mongols never raided North Russia or Finland, where in fact these components peak in Europe today. So the most plausible explanation for the relatively high levels of Siberian admixture there is Finno-Ugric or Uralic ancestry. Indeed, the Finns obviously speak a Finno-Ugric language, and so do some North Russian groups, while many others did until recently.

Below is a different kind of analysis of autosomal DNA. It's a pairwise Fixation Index (Fst) test between 16 global populations based on 129,673 SNPs (3). It includes two East Asian samples, the same Han Chinese set as in the above ADMIXTURE analyses, and a Japanese sample from Tokyo. The results appear to correlate very closely with geography, which suggests that we're basically looking at the effects of isolation-by-distance. Interestingly, the Polish sample from Lodz and Warsaw (Po) is genetically more distant from the Han Chinese (CHB) and Japanese (JPT) than are the Swedes (Sw), Norwegians (No) and Germans (Ge). The differences aren't big, but they're consistent, which means that at the very least these Poles can't be carrying more East Asian ancestry than the Scandinavian and German samples.

Next up is a global Principal Component Analysis (PCA) from the same study, featuring the same samples and markers. Again, it's another way of looking at variation in autosomal DNA, and again the results indicate that Poles don't show any special genome-wide genetic links to East Asians. The Polish samples are sitting close to the top of the European cluster and overlap strongly with other Northern and Central Europeans. Indeed, many of the outliers pulling towards the West African (YRI) and East Asian (CHB + JPT) clusters are French, British and German. These individuals are possibly carrying very recent non-European ancestry due to colonial links between Western Europe and the third world. There are also a considerable number of Russians streaming towards the East Asians, and that's probably due to the Finno-Ugric mediated Siberian influence in North Russia described above.

It might also be useful to assess the level of West Asian or Near Eastern autosomal admixture in Poland compared to other parts of Europe, because many of the Turkic groups which ended up on the Eastern European steppe were largely of West Asian origin. Therefore, if there was a significant genetic contribution from such groups to the Polish gene pool, then Poles today ought to show inflated affinity to West Asian populations compared to other Central and Northern Europeans. The simple answer is that they don't, which can be clearly seen on the pairwise Fst clustering analysis below based on approximately 101,000 SNPs (4).

Y-chromosome or paternal markers tell the same story as autosomal DNA. The most common Y-DNA haplogroup in Poland is R1a1a, making up about 50% of all the Y-chromosome lineages in the country. Based on academic and commercial testing of hundreds of Polish samples to date, it's safe to say that the most dominant subclades of this Eurasian haplogroup in Poland are the European-specific R-M458 and R-Z280 (5, 6). These subclades are closely related to the Scandinavian-specific R-Z284, because all three markers come off the Z283 branch of the R1a1a haplotree. The Z283 mutation is also mostly confined to Europe and possibly originated there.

The main Asian-specific subclade of R1a1a, known as R-Z94, appears to be extremely rare in Poland. This is the subclade that makes up the main share of the R1a1a in Mongolian and Turkic populations of Central Asia, as well as in South Asians. However, even the very few R-Z94 cases among Poles are more closely related to Ashkenazi lineages than those of Mongolians or Central Asians. What all of this means, of course, is that Mongolian or Turkic paternal ancestry isn't "hiding" in Poland under all that R1a1a.

The most common Y-DNA haplogroup among Mongolians and their close ethnic kin is C3. There's actually a particular lineage of C3 called the "star-cluster chromosome" which pops up regularly in purported descendents of the infamous Mongolian warlord Genghis Khan. This might mean that it's a marker of paternal ancestry from Genghis himself, which has been suggested in several academic papers (7, 8, 9). In any case, the haplotype is considered to be very young, probably less than 1000 years, and widespread in areas of Asia where the Mongol hordes were most active during the early Middle Ages. Therefore, it seems to be an excellent signal of Mongolian genetic influence from this key period. Below is a map of its frequencies in a variety of Asian groups.

However, this marker has never been recorded in Poland, where C3 itself is extremely unusual. Indeed, Derenko et al. conclude that based on the paucity of the "star-cluster haplotype" among ethnic Russians, the Mongol hordes of the Middle Ages didn't even leave a genetic imprint on European Russia.

It is known that the Mongol Empire expanded over a considerable part of Eastern Europe by 1248 due to the khan Batu’s conquests. Russian principalities were vassal states of the Mongol Empire until 1480. However, we found no genetic traces of the Mongol sovereignty over Russia (in the form of male lineages of the cluster of Genghis Khan descendants) in the Russian population.

Poles do sporadically carry East Eurasian-specific mtDNA (ie. maternal) lineages, and it was recently suggested by Mielnik-Sikorska et al. that some of these lineages (ie. C4a1a, G2a and D5a2a1a1) might "possibly reflect relatively recent contacts of Slavs with nomadic Altaic peoples" (10). However, the authors also note that these markers have a wide distribution across Eurasia and might actually represent prehistoric gene-flow between Asia and Europe.

In fact, ancient DNA results have recently revealed unexpected frequencies of East Eurasian-specific mtDNA haplogroups - including C1, C4a2, C5, D* and Z1a - in Northern and Eastern European remains from the Neolithic and Mesolithic (11, 12, 13, 14). The samples were always small, but nevertheless it's useful to note that the incidence of the eastern mtDNA lineages was much higher in these ancient samples than in any modern Eastern European populations west of the Volga. What this suggests is that the vast majority of East Eurasian ancestry in Europe might have arrived there thousands of years before the Mongol incursions, and much of it has been lost since then, rather than gained, due to continuous population movements from west to east across the continent.

To add another twist to the tale, it actually seems that all Europeans do show significant prehistoric East Eurasian genome-wide admixture, so perhaps it's only the ancient eastern mtDNA markers that have almost gone extinct? The topic has been now been discussed in a couple of papers, and apparently this admixture shows higher affinity to modern Amerindians than North or East Asians (15), which is very curious indeed. But the details are sketchy because the results so far have been based on DNA from modern samples, so hopefully we can learn more very soon thanks to analyses of genome-wide markers from prehistoric Eurasian remains. In any case, a group of Poles was featured in one of these papers, and this is how they compared to other Europeans in a formal mixture test with the ADMIXTOOLS software (16).

The positions of the samples in the table are based on the "Sardinian" f3-statistic, which indicates the strength of the Amerindian-like admixture signal when Karitiana Indians and Sardinians are chosen as references. The results appear fairly random in some cases, and that's probably because they're skewed by such factors as genetic drift and sample size - for instance, heavy drift might dampen the signal, while a larger sample size might increase it. But the outcomes are also clearly influenced by relatively recent admixture from Siberia, Central Asia and/or the Indian subcontinent. That's because the samples known to carry such admixtures, like the HGDP Russians and Turks, are at the top of the table. Therefore, it's worth noting that the Polish sample is found at the bottom, which is in line with results from all the other analyses presented above.

Please note that the information in this post pertains to the current Polish population by and large, and to individuals with all grandparents of ethnic Polish origin. It's not relevant to individuals whose recent ancestors came from within the borders (or former borders) of Poland but their ethnic origins were uncertain. Keep in mind that Poland was not as ethnically or genetically homogenous before World War II as it is today. Also worth noting is that in a country of almost 40 million people, some individuals will have very atypical pedigrees, and it might even be possible to find someone with, say, Papuan ancestry in Poland if we look hard enough.

By the way, I've no idea who made that meme at the top of the post, or where it was published originally, but I think it's very appropriate here. Please let me know if it violates any copyright laws and I'll take it down.


1. Khrunin AV, Khokhrin DV, Filippova IN, Esko T, Nelis M, et al. (2013) A Genome-Wide Analysis of Populations from European Russia Reveals a New Pole of Genetic Diversity in Northern Europe. PLoS ONE 8(3): e58552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058552

2. Morten Rasmussen et al., Ancient human genome sequence of an extinct Palaeo-Eskimo, Nature 463, 757-762 (11 February 2010) doi:10.1038/nature08835; Received 30 November 2009; Accepted 18 January 2010

3. Simon C Heath et al, Investigation of the fine structure of European populations with applications to disease association studies, European Journal of Human Genetics (2008) 16, 1413–1429; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.210

4. Esko et al., Genetic characterization of northeastern Italian population isolates in the context of broader European genetic diversity, European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 19 December 2012; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.229

5. Peter A Underhill et al., Separating the post-Glacial coancestry of European and Asian Y chromosomes within haplogroup R1a, European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 4 November 2009; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.194

6. Family Tree DNA R1a1a and Subclades Y-DNA Project

7. Derenko et al., Distribution of the Male Lineages of Genghis Khan’s Descendants in Northern Eurasian Populations, Russian Journal of Genetics, 2007, Vol. 43, No. 3; DOI: 10.1134/S1022795407030179

8. Zerjal et al., The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols, Am J Hum Genet. 2003 March; 72(3): 717–721. PMCID: PMC1180246

9. Abilev S. et al., The Y-chromosome C3* star-cluster attributed to Genghis Khan's descendants is present at high frequency in the Kerey clan from Kazakhstan, Hum Biol. 2012 Feb;84(1):79-89. doi: 10.3378/027.084.0106.

10. Mielnik-Sikorska M, Daca P, Malyarchuk B, Derenko M, Skonieczna K, et al. (2013) The History of Slavs Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequences. PLoS ONE 8(1): e54360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054360

11. Zsuzsanna Guba et al., HVS-I polymorphism screening of ancient human mitochondrial DNA provides evidence for N9a discontinuity and East Asian haplogroups in the Neolithic Hungary, Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 15 September 2011; doi: 10.1038/jhg.2011.103

12. Alexey G Nikitin et al., Mitochondrial haplogroup C in ancient mitochondrial DNA from Ukraine extends the presence of East Eurasian genetic lineages in Neolithic Central and Eastern Europe, Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 7 June 2012; doi:10.1038/jhg.2012.69

13. Lillie, Malcolm C et al., Prehistoric populations of Ukraine: Migration at the later Mesolithic to Neolithic transition, Population Dynamics in Prehistory and Early History (2012), Publication Date: July 2012, ISBN: 978-3-11-026630-6, DOI: 10.1515/9783110266306.93

14. Der Sarkissian C, Balanovsky O, Brandt G, Khartanovich V, Buzhilova A, et al. (2013) Ancient DNA Reveals Prehistoric Gene-Flow from Siberia in the Complex Human Population History of North East Europe. PLoS Genet 9(2): e1003296. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003296

15. Lipson et al., Efficient moment-based inference of admixture parameters and sources of gene flow, arXiv:1212.2555v1 [q-bio.PE]

16. Patterson et al., Ancient Admixture in Human History, Genetics: Published Articles Ahead of Print, published on September 7, 2012 as 10.1534/genetics.112.145037

See also...

R1a and R1b from an early Mongolian tomb